Anniversary 1859

The anniversary this month is from May 1859. It is, at least in my opinion, the point where the Cemetery began its slow decline. An Emergency Board Meeting was called by the Secretary, C.S.Todd. He said he had received a letter from the Chairman. The minutes of the meeting describe what the contents of this letter contained.

‘The sec. said a letter from Mr J.S.Thompson resigning his office as chairman and director of this board. The directors having considered the reasons assigned by Mr Thompson for such resignation and being desirous that he should still continue to act as chairman of the board. It was resolved that such resignation be not accepted. That the sec. be instructed to address a letter to Mr Thompson expressing the earnest desire and request of the directors that he will reconsider his decision and by  withdrawing his letter of resignation resume his position and seat as chairman and director the board.’

The reply

On the 2nd June that year C.S.Todd read out the reply from J.S.Thompson to the Board. The minutes simply state that,

‘ received a reply thereto which he read to the Board and from which it appeared that Mr Thompson had determined not to withdraw his letter of resignation’

It is difficult to gauge from the above what a momentous point in time this was. The dry minutes do not reflect what consternation this resignation letter would have engendered. John Solomon Thompson had been the man who had navigated the Company through the task of selecting and buying the land. He had been instrumental in instigating the Act of Parliament that prevented the Hull Corporation for taking over the Cemetery. As the Chair he had negotiated hard with the Railway Company and forced it to change the proposed route of the Victoria Dock line. He had brought the Company through all of these perils and now he was resigning. Why?

What’s gone wrong?

Sadly, we have no knowledge of the ‘why’. Where are these letters? They are lost to us now in the wastepaper drive fomented by Churchill in World War Two.  What on earth had happened that made the esteemed Chair feel he could no longer carry on?

In March everything was rosy. The Company were in negotiations with the Local Board of Health about leasing the western part of their grounds for burials. The Company had just signed the agreement and covenant with the Hull Workhouse for the burial of the town’s poor.

In those intervening two months something had upset John Thompson so much that he felt he had to resign.

I could hazard a couple of guesses on what had caused this turn of events but that is only guesswork and not to be written down as proof. Oh, how I’d love to have seen those letters that were sent. As I said earlier it’s just another of those mysteries that crop up now and again and cause me a headache. A troublesome anniversary. Anniversary April 1858

 

Anniversary April 1858

Sometimes, you know you are going to have a bad day. From when you get up to when you go to bed things just keep on going wrong. This month’s anniversary celebrates – if that’s the right word – a bad week for a number of people.

The clergy attack

Back in April 1858 John Shields had a bad week. On Thursday, the 1st of April Mr Shields had to defend himself against some criticism from the clergy. Mr Graham, the curate of Holy Trinity, approached the Board. He said that the superintendent had used, ‘most gross and insulting language towards him when in the discharge of his clerical duties.’

Sadly, what was said or not said, was not recorded. However, the Board said they would investigate and called Mr Shields before them. The Board may also have been wanting to be seen to do the right thing. However, the Board must also have had misgivings about Mr Graham’s evidence.

This was because the clergy of Holy Trinity parish had long held some resentment towards the Cemetery. With the coming of the Cemetery the burials in the Holy Trinity churchyard and the Castle Street burial ground had decreased sharply. This in turn affected the revenue of the clergy. And, sadly, this drop in income was probably the most important factor in their continuing to bury people in these overcrowded burial grounds.

So, the Board knew that there may well have been some other reason behind this accusation. I don’t believe that their investigation would have been more than asking Mr Shields whether he had been insulting to Mr Graham. When Mr Shields probably replied no, that would have been the end of that.

The next week

On the following Monday, the 5th, Mr Shields had a much more delicate and distasteful task before him. Let’s try to set the scene.

He will have been working in his office in the Lodge. Probably trying to get his books up to date as Sunday was the busiest day for the Cemetery. That was day when most burials took place and he was probably rushed off his feet that day getting the chapel ready for each burial. Apart from that he would have had to check the paperwork for each burial and take the monies owed. This was apart from supervising the staff throughout the day. Yes, probably a busy day and Monday was the day to sort it all out.

A knock on the door of the office. Two of his staff stood there. Probably with their caps off and maybe even shuffling their feet a little. On the door being opened I’m pretty certain that one of them would have said they’d found something. And I’m equally sure that Mr Shields would have asked what had they found and been equally as shocked at their answer.

cholera monument 1993

Inside the box

For they had found a box in the shrubbery near to the new cholera monument. Inside that box they found two dead children. Two female babies, One can imagine his shock at this news and his horror when he went to look for himself. He contacted the police immediately who arrived and took the children’s bodies away ‘to Newland to wait the Coroner’s request’.

He reported it to the Board but no more information is forthcoming in the Minute Books.

Child life expectation

However this was not a singular incident. It may well have been unusual in the confines of the Cemetery but the lives of children during this period could be short. The life expectancy in Britain in 1850 was 42 years. For the working class this would have been significantly lower, probably 28 years. And the life expectancy at this time was so low because of the large number of children who died before they reached the age of 5. Over 25% of children died before reaching the age of one. 40% of all the annual deaths in the Victorian period were of children under 5 years old.

The anonymous author of A Short History of the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, commented that to be an English baby at the beginning of the 20th century was ‘to occupy a position as perilous as that of a soldier going about to go into action’. With such statistics it is difficult to counter that claim.

Illegitimacy

Illegitimate babies were much more at risk. In the 1870s it was estimated that 35% of all such births in manufacturing towns died before the age of one. In London it was nearer 75%. It is highly likely that the children found in the Cemetery were illegitimate.

Let’s look at this crime a little. It is sad to say that in law, and probably in reality, this crime was seen as a ‘female crime’. Until 1803 the crime of infanticide was tried under the Bastardy Act of 1624. Under this act the mother had to prove, via witnesses, that the child had been born dead. Unless she could prove this she faced the death penalty, for it was a capital crime. Over time, as more and more juries failed to convict the accused for one reason or another, a new Act was proposed.

1803

This was the 1803 Act. This Act required the prosecution to prove that a murder had taken place. However if this could not be proved another option presented itself. The jury could return a verdict of ‘concealment of birth’. The penalty for this was from two months up to two years in prison.

Why would a woman conceal her pregnancy or the birth of a child? One of the many reasons why this would happen was the nature of Victorian society, especially towards unmarried mothers. Emsley in Crime and Society in England 1750-1900 states,

‘Most of the women brought before the courts charged with infanticide during the 18th and 19th centuries appear to have been young women, commonly servants, desperate to maintain their positions and their respectability’.

So babies were ‘routinely killed’. Carver in The 19th Century Underworld states,

‘The Thames held as many bodies as the Ganges’. He goes on to show a typical case he found in the Marylebone Mercury of August 1859,

The body of a baby boy was found floating in a water-butt of a house in Upper Boston Street. Attention had been alerted when the wife of a tenant noticed a peculiar taste in the water.’ It doesn’t bear thinking about does it? Yet, as the figures above show, this was a commonplace occurrence.

The New Poor Law

How did we get to this situation? The law didn’t help. The 1834 New Poor Law Act had a Bastardy clause. This said that all children born out of wedlock were the sole responsibility of their mothers. To gain a flavour of how the law saw such people the mothers of bastard children were described as ‘vicious’ in the legislation. It was hoped that the legislation would stop, ‘idleness, bastardy and beer drinking.’ But only in women as the Act wasn’t aimed at the other sexual partner!

Abortion

And, of course, in an attempt to avoid this scenario abortion rears its head. And we come back to the 1803 Act. Prior to that Act abortion was met with a fine or a short term of imprisonment. However if the child was terminated before ‘the quickening’ there was no penalty. The ‘quickening’ was deemed to be when the mother could feel the foetus move, around the 13th week of pregnancy.

By 1837 this loophole was removed. Under this Act,  it was only the abortionist who committed a criminal act in conducting an abortion not the mother. This changed with the introduction of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861 which is still on the statute book. It encompasses such crimes as GBH and ABH. Under this Act both the abortionist and the woman were both deemed equally guilty. Abortion was removed as a criminal act by legislation in 1967.

Conclusion

However, the foetus still needed to be disposed of. Which is where the bodies in the cemetery may well have come from.

I’m sure that John Shields’ week must have become better. I wonder more about the poor girl who gave birth. Would she ever forget her dead children being left alone in a lonely place beside a monument to death from disease? In that context John Shields’ bad week was nothing in comparison. It was not a good anniversary for her. That girl had a heavy burden to carry for much longer than a week. Placed upon her by an uncaring society. A society lauded by some politicians and historians, even now, as a highpoint of civilization. Victorian values eh?

Anniversary March 1877

 

Hello, Goodbye: The Art of Knowing When to Leave.

Hello, Goodbye.

You may remember the Beatles singing the above song. Not perhaps one of their better songs but it perhaps sums up my position.

This piece is looking at my introduction to Hull General Cemetery, at least in a work sense, and my recent decision to step back from the Friends, and to some extent, Hull General Cemetery. In essence it means having the ability, like any good guest should have, to know when its time to leave. So, that explains the Hello, Goodbye title.

Some of this was also prompted by a recent visit from my eldest son and his family. He entered the loft with the aim of retrieving some of his older computer stuff. Whilst there he discovered some things I’d forgotten about which will feature in this article.

Cemetery work

I started to work in cemeteries in August 1974. I was 22. I’d worked in factories for since leaving school and I’d had enough. I wanted to experience pastures new. And not just metaphorically. I wanted flowers, meadow grass, trees rather than thundering machines and conveyor processes. In essence I wanted nature rather than the satanic mills.

No, you would be forgiven for scratching your head here. What bit about grave digging, apart from the obvious, and disagreeable ones, equates to nature? Why did I choose this job.

Well, in all honesty, I did not particularly want to be a gravedigger. I just wanted to work for the Parks department. My ‘good’ luck was that the only vacancy going at that time was for a grave digger. When I stood in the portacabin in what is now the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust garden in the Pearson Park yard that was the job that was offered to me.

I was asked whether I had a problem with doing this job and I said, quite naively, no. I was 22 as I said, and of course I was pretending to be grown up. I didn’t have a problem with the job probably because I didn’t think it through. And also I didn’t get the time to think it through as I was asked to turn up at Northern Cemetery the next day at 7,30 a.m.

Pay check

That was how I started as a grave digger. Here’s my Parks pay check which, back in those more innocent times, had to be shown to collect my wage packet every week. The wages were delivered to every site via a taxi. How the taxi was never robbed by some likely lads with stockings over their heads and carrying ‘shooters’ I have no idea?

Pay check

By 1979 I had worked at the job for 5 years. I was pretty good at it. I’d overcome the nasty parts of the job. You take the rough with the smooth with any job. I had access to flowers, trees, meadow grass now. On the rough side I had gained experience with some of the less pleasant aspects of nature. You don’t want to know about that and I’m not going to tell you.

Boredom

But I was getting bored. Not just with the job but I was becoming very aware that I needed more stimulation. It’s something I suffer from and it has coloured every job I have had.

By this time I had become a shop steward. Probably due to this role I was conscious of gaining some respect from colleagues and management as a ‘bright lad’. My intelligence was being called upon more and more. And I enjoyed it too. I’d been offered the role as a foreman but my socialist principles wouldn’t let me take that step.

So, to offset this boredom, I transferred to Western Cemetery in May 1979 in a straight transfer. Well, two staff went to Northern to replace me and I went to Western. I told you I was good didn’t I? And yes, I know, the sin of pride etc. But, in all honesty and humility, I was bloody good at this job.

The job at Western Cemetery was basically the same but the vista was different. Western was more historic and, as I’ve said many times, the staff’s duties at Western included HGC too at that time. On the whole the transfer enabled the historian in me to be indulged.

Leaving for university

However I was planning for a life beyond digging graves. I had experienced some trade union teaching at Hull University and elsewhere. This enabled me to do my work as a union rep better. It was my first taste of education since I had left school, when, aged 15, I’d sworn that I’d never go in a classroom again. So, this ‘mature student’ thing I’d heard of became more than a possibility. University here we come.

I gained a place and the rest is history. However my workmates at Western decided to send me on my way in style. Here’s the card they gave me on the day I left.

Front of card

They also bought me a pen and a dictionary.

Here’s the inside of the card.

Inside of the card

And, as you would expect from me, I thanked them and said that, as they couldn’t spell colleagues, they should perhaps keep the dictionary. I was joking of course. They’d worked with me long enough to know that.

That was in September 1981. Over 40 years ago now. Sadly, three of those colleagues are no longer with us. I attended the funeral of the third of that group in January of this year. He was laid to rest in Western Cemetery. Another of that small group I last met in the mid 1990’s and the final one I last saw the day I received the card and took my leave of them all..

Shelf life

Goodbye.

Now to today. There is a ‘shelf life’ to us all. The major one is when we are born and when we die. But even within our lives there are other points where change happens. As the example above of me leaving the parks department shows, change happens. Those people who signed the card were my day-to-day companions for more than two years. We shared trials and tribulations together as well as the good times.

Now, I have no idea where the two remaining members of that group are or whether they are still alive. In September 1981 my ‘shelf life’ for being a gravedigger had run out. It’s just a natural thing. We do it all the time. It’s called living your life..

The ghost in the machine

As the Beatles sang in their song Hello, Goodbye, ‘You say stop, I say go’. Well I intend to do both of those things.

I now feel that my ‘shelf life’ with the Friends has probably run its course. I can’t put my finger on a specific reason for this other than my instinct that I have taken my part of the FOHGC as far as I can. I feel that the baton should be passed on.

Of course I will still help where I can. I can always be called upon to support the future work of the Friends. But right now I think the Friends needs someone more dynamic to sit in this chair. Someone with both the historical and also the environmental interests of the cemetery in mind when future decisions are taken. Someone with more time and energy than I possess right now.

Helen Bovill

At a recent meeting of the Friends it was decided that Helen Bovill should take on that role. No thumbscrews were necessary. A willing volunteer is worth a hundred times a conscript. She will make an excellent chair and spokesperson for the group. I’m sure that you all will wish her success in her new role as indeed all of the members of the FOHGC do.

In terms of the website I’ll be carrying on for a little while but that too needs to be passed on to more capable hands. When that change happens is not known yet but will probably be in the summer. I’ll still send the odd article in to whoever is editing it after that, and if they think it’s good enough they might even post it.

Anyway, thanks for all the support, help and kindness shown to me over the past few years.

We’ve all come a long way. Let’s hope the path is a little clearer and gentler for all of us from now on.

 

Anniversary March 1877

This month’s anniversary is interesting. In May 1876 a discussion took place as to whether a clock tower should be built in the grounds or a clock installed in the lodge. The question rattled back and forth for months. By that September the decision was taken to install the clock into the Lodge belfry.

HGC Lodge pre 1877

This repair work was to cost £94. 5s which was a considerable sum for a building that was only 30 years old.

The AGM

In March 1877 the decision was ratified at the AGM and the plan was to install the clock and also conduct some repair work to the Lodge as it,

AGM discussion regarding the installation of the clock.

 

This interaction is interesting in a number of ways. Firstly the decision to repair to the original design shows that the Lodge was something they were proud of. Somewhat different to their feelings in the late 1840s. Then it was obvious from the Company paperwork that the Board were heartily sick of the troubles the Lodge had caused them.

Secondly, it shows the Cemetery Company still wanting to present a good image of itself to the community. The placing of the clock was civic minded. Yes, they may have cloaked this idea with the line, ‘business of the cemetery’ but they knew progress was happening.

By this time, D. P. Garbutt had begun the development of the Avenues. This development, to the Board,  was surely just the beginnings of the area the Cemetery occupied becoming more salubrious. Who knows where that may lead?

As such the installation of a clock was a smart move. It was civic-minded enough to appeal, yet it’s cost was small. In essence, a win-win situation for the Company.

Fixing the clock

The Company received a tender for fixing the clock from a Mr George Pickering of Prospect Street. This tender was accepted and the cost of making and installing the clock was £7.

The final cost of repairing the Lodge and installing the clock was a stupendous £124 10s. At this time the Company were still desirous of making a show and if that meant spending money, then so be it.

Later in its long life it would not be so happy to do so.

The Lodge to the left with clock.

 

Vandalism

A perennial problem cropped up on the first of June 1959. In a letter to the then Chief Constable of Hull Police, Mr. S. Lawrence esq. O.B.E. the problem was aired. That problem was vandalism.

The role of Cemetery Secretary at this time was held by the Company Solicitor Mr J.F. Payne of Payne and Payne, Solicitors. Here is the text of his letter.

The first letter

‘Unfortunately, the Company is almost impossible to supervise without a police force of its own, which the Company simply cannot afford to pay for and accordingly damage to grave stones and monuments is invariably reported late, which makes the job of the police force in detecting the miscreants, equally impossible.

We have, however, a fairly recent instance, some three weeks ago, where a smooth granite tomb has been interfered with and damaged, and accordingly we wonder whether it would be possible for any useful action to be taken by you on this recent complaint, but perhaps particularly, whether it would be possible to give the Cemetery just a little extra supervision by the beatman concerned for say the next three or four weeks.

If we may suggest it, as the gates of the Cemetery are now left open it might be possible for a beatman with a bicycle to ride through a portion of the Cemetery on his rounds. We think the most likely miscreants are teenagers.

We refer to the interference with a very smooth granite tomb. It does just occur to us that, if you felt the matter justified it, this might, even at this late date, bear some fingerprints of those responsible’

Naivety

The letter shows not only that vandalism was just as common then as now. So much for the ‘Good Old Days’

It also shows a rather touching naivety in the power of detecting criminals that the police may have. The request for a ‘beatman’, or a police officer on a bicycle, to ride through the Cemetery is perhaps a worthwhile approach. The taking of fingerprints from overturned headstones is quite laughable.

I suspect that this letter was sent more in hope rather than having a belief that action would be taken.

It also shows that the Cemetery was fast becoming derelict. This was a foretaste for the future and the decline of the Cemetery was already well established by the late 1950s.

The second letter

We have no way of knowing what the official response to this request was.  Another letter of the 7th June 1960 to the Chief Constable showed that good may have come from the initial letter.

‘Dear Sir,

I understand that two or three of your officers have recently interviewed several youths in connection with damage done to trees and headstones in this cemetery.

It would be appreciated if you would forward to me copies of any statements obtained by your officers, or given by them, together with, if possible, any reported interviews.’

This letter shows perhaps a little naivety of legal proceedings, especially from a solicitor. He wanted access to police interviews and statements from people. These people had not been legally processed at that time.

However the letter also shows that some youths had been apprehended. So perhaps the initial letter had met with a positive response.

We have no further information on this intriguing line of inquiry. Sadly we do know that it did not end the vandalism there.

The Cemetery Burial Records

Some of you may remember that, as part of the rehabilitation of Hull General Cemetery, some research and administrative tasks were to be carried out. It was hoped that when these tasks were completed it would help to raise the profile of the site.

One of those tasks was to transcribe the Cemetery burial records onto an Excel spreadsheet. This would then be placed onto this site so that people could search for their relatives or use it for research for other purposes. We were also going to share this database with the Carnegie Heritage Centre, the East Yorkshire Family History Society  and also the Hull History Centre.

https://www.carnegiehull.co.uk/  

https://www.eyfhs.org.uk/

https://www.hullhistorycentre.org.uk/home.aspx

Still our aim

That is still our aim. You’ll be glad to know that this exercise is reaching the final stages. It’s about 80% complete. We would like to have it completed by the Heritage Open Days in September this year.  Perhaps even have a ‘Grand Opening’ of it at a venue yet to be decided upon.

However, to make that date we would like to ask you to join us in finalising this project.

You will need your own computer and access to the internet. The actual work involved is light but it does need patience and attention to detail.

This project will be invaluable to the City of Hull as well as the professional researcher and the person who just wants to find their ancestor’s grave.

Here’s an example  of a burial record so you can see what the job entails. Its from July 1860. As you can see the social history is apparent from the first entry. Rebecca Day dying of fever in Hull Borough Asylum. This building, the last remains of it having been demolished within the last two years, was set at the back of the present HRI. Just think how much more you could find out.

Hull Cemetery Burial record 1860

 

If you want to be part of this project then please contact the FOHGC. We’ll guide you through it and help where its needed.

Hold the front page!

Sorry, I’ve always wanted to write that and this is the closest I can get to it.

I just thought I’d let you know that I will be giving a talk at the Hull Central Library on Saturday, 19th February. The talk may probably be the last time I’ll be doing The Rise and Fall of Hull General Cemetery.

The talk takes place in the old Local Studies Library, known as the James Reckitt room. It starts at 11.00 a.m. and I think there is a charge of £1.

Hope to see you there.

Anniversary February 1847

The date above is a very important anniversary for the cemetery. At an Emergency General Meeting (EGM) of the Board some momentous decisions were made. This took place on the 19th of February immediately before the first Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the proprietors of the cemetery. That is the stockholders who owned the cemetery land.

Joint Stock

It perhaps is a good time to explain how the cemetery was run. This was via a mechanism known as a joint stock company. This method was organised in this way. A group of people would buy shares in a prospect or company and by buying these shares those people would actually own the project they bought shares in. The amount of the project they owned depended upon the amount of shares they bought. They exercised this power via the AGM. However the Cemetery Company was run by the Board of Directors who were voted in at the AGM.

The minute books entries

Which is why the anniversary of the EGM on the 19th February 1847 was so important. Here’s the item in the minute books.

p 153, Hull General Cemetery Minute books

Here’s part of the transcript of the above as I know that reading such writing can be tiring.

for the purpose of considering the expediency of at once proceeding with the erection of the entrance lodge and gates, as also with the church and catacombs and the best mode of arranging the latter.’

The following page outlined what the Board wanted.

p 154 Hull General Cemetery Minute book

And here, once again, is a transcription of the above.

‘That Mr Broderick be forthwith instructed to prepare (for consideration by the Board) an amended design for the church so as to embrace two places for divine service with catacombs underneath and also for the entrance lodge and the gates and palisades connected there with – the whole of the expense being limited to £3000.’ The Catacombs of Hull General Cemetery

Today’s cost

So £3000 for the Lodge, the Chapel, the Catacombs and the gates and fencing of the Cemetery. Not bad. Of course there has been a bit of inflation since then. A good website called Measuring Worth  gives us a rough guide to how much £3000 in 1847 was worth today. http://Measuringworth.com Today that sum would be £280,300. Still not a large amount in my opinion but of course the labour costs would then have been so much less than today.

The anniversary of this decision could be said to have given the structures of the Cemetery their lives. Sadly, most of these have gone and we are left with only the three of the gates and a small remainder of the walls. The Catacombs of Hull General Cemetery These are now grade two listed with Historic England which provides a measure of protection now. What a pity the rest was lost.

Edward Nequest

Edward Nequest was part of a very select group of people. There were only four superintendents of Hull General Cemetery.

John Shields was the first. He and Cuthbert Brodrick laid out the paths and plots of the cemetery prior to its opening in 1847. John Shields died suddenly in 1866. He was succeeded by Edward. He himself retired in 1891. Michael Kelly took over until 1944. After that Michael’s daughter Cicely Kelly continued in this post until her enforced retirement in the 1950s. There were no more superintendents.

Edward’s birth

Edward Nequest was born in Hull in 1823. The image below shows his baptism at Holy Trinity that year.

Edward's baptism 1823

In the second column below, which may be difficult to read, the name Edward is inserted. This is followed by ‘S of’ denoting ‘son of’. The registrar also had difficult with the surname. The correction is in brackets. Edward’s parents were Peter and Mary. Their address is given as Myton and the father’s occupation is recorded as a mariner.  The incumbent of Holy Trinity at the time was John Bromby.

John Bromby

This vicar had the longest tenure of any incumbent of this parish. He became the vicar of Holy Trinity in 1797 and stepped down from the post in 1867 after 70 years service. He died the following year and is buried in the churchyard of North Ferriby.

Edward was the second son from this marriage. The first son was also called Peter and he was born in 1821 and baptised at the same church.

Peter Nequest elder brother bapt 1821

Home

We have no idea of where the Nequest family lived at this time but by the 1841 census we know the family lived in Cogan Street.  It still exists but in a truncated form. Clive Sullivan Way now occupies the southern part where Cogan Street stood.

Cogan Street 1890

In the 1841 census of Peter Nequest we find him listed as a ‘Stower’, and his wife, Mary, is strangely placed near the end of the family listing. The 1841 census generally is a blunt tool in comparison with later ones. It often rounded the ages of children up or down to the nearest five yearly span. We find that in the 1841 Nequest census both of Peter’s sons’ ages, Peter and Edward, are given as 15 yet Peter would have been 20 and Edward 18 at the time. The younger Peter, as you can see, is listed as an attorney’s clerk. Edward was soon to follow his brother into this profession.

You may also see that Peter the elder has an ‘F’ against his name. That is because he was born in Sweden in 1793 and migrated to Hull. We have no information why he did this. A shrewd guess would be that it may have been due to the Napoleonic Wars and the British blockade of the continent at the time. A mariner would have found work difficult at that time and emigrating to Britain was a way out of this dilemma.

Peter, Ed's father 1841 census

1851 census

By the time of the 1851 census Edward has moved from the family home. He now lived in a small terrace called Ville Terrace off the newly laid out Hessle Road not far from no1. Hessle Road.

Edward nequest 1851

Perhaps more importantly for Edward was that he now was married. He had married Ann Plaxton in 1849. He was also a solicitor’s clerk.

Ed marr cert 1849

Not just any solicitor. He was apprenticed and articled to one of the most famous solicitors in Hull. His employer was Charles Spilman Todd. This man had been instrumental in carrying through the purchase of the cemetery’s grounds. Indeed the first meeting of the provisional committee took place in his office at no.15 Bowlalley Lane.

15, Bowlalley Lane today

C.S.Todd as he was known was both the solicitor and secretary for the Company and also was a large shareholder. Still later in his life he was a councillor and became the secretary for the Local Board of Health and eventually he was elected as Sheriff of Hull. The Creation of Hull General Cemetery: Part Two

Shadrach Wride

In the 1840s the first secretary to C.S.Todd was a man called Shadrach Wride. This man is worthy of an article himself.

Baptised in 1796 in Holy Trinity the year before Rev. Bromby took over. Shadrach was the son of a man of the same name. This man had been the foreman of Jackson’s wood yard in the Groves and he ‘luckily’ married the bosses’ daughter.  When he died in 1823 he left the business to his son. Whether the business was in a good state or worth anything is open to question.

Sadly the business failed in 1827 and Shadrach Wride entered the Bankruptcy Court. The timber yard was auctioned off. Even the family home on Charterhouse Lane had to be sold.

wride's bankruptcy June 1827

Debtor’s prison

One has to remember the draconian laws then regarding debts. Today a person who becomes bankrupt can have that burden discharged after two or three years whilst not paying their debts. Not so in Georgian and Victorian times. Charles Dickens’s father was a debtor and was placed in Marshalsea Prison until the debt was repaid. Dickens himself had to work in a blacking factory to help pay this debt at the tender age of 12. This had a marked effect upon the young boy and it came out in his works in later life.

Little Dorrit is almost completely set inside a debtor’s prison. Nicholas Nickelby, Great Expectations and Pickwick Papers all allude or feature the stigma of the debtor’s prison. Shadrach Wride would have used all in his power to avoid being imprisoned for this ‘crime’. That he did so, and was later rehabilitated says a great deal about the man.

Rebuilding his life

After this date Shadrach contented himself in making ends meet by taking on a number of roles. Often cited as an agent for insurance companies and emigration agencies he was still a respected member of society. He was the secretary for the Fish street Church and was part of that committee until his death. His abode was at 15 Spring Bank, on the corner of Spring Street, and this address was often used as a postal address for the Cemetery before the lodge was built.

15 Spring Bank

To show that the ‘Good Old Days’ never really existed the newspaper item below perhaps shows that modern life is typical of what went before.

lead stealing from Wride

Mr Wride was also the secretary for the C.S.Todd’s legal practice and therefore the secretary for the Company. The evidence for this is often to be found in the newspapers of the time but also in the records of the Company that still exist.

S Wride first prospectus issued for HGC April 1845

Shadrach Wride was also listed as the Company secretary on the brass plate that was buried in the foundations of the Lodge at the official opening of the Cemetery in June 1847.

Wride’s death

So the man’s death came as a shock to many parties. Shadrach died on July 25th 1850 as the news item below shows.

Wrides death

He is buried in Hull General Cemetery in compartment 35 only two grave spaces away from his employer C.S.Todd’s own grave. the cause of death is cited as apoplexy. The vacancy he left was filled by Edward Nequest.

Edward’s work

The first we learn of Edward’s new appointment is once again via the local newspaper. This is some five years after Wride’s death. It is obvious that Edward is not taking things for granted, signing himself as pro secretary. The term ‘pro‘ here is standing for pro tem, meaning for the time being. There were no chickens being counted too early here.

ed nequest first mention as sec of HGC 1855

By the following March, in a further newspaper item, Edward signs himself as the secretary, so his appointment must have been confirmed.

However whether any such appointment was ever confirmed is open to doubt. Shadrach Wride’s occupation given in the Cemetery’s burial register is ‘agent to the life insurance company‘ even though he had been both C.S.Todd and the Company secretary for at least five years. Edward, when he bought graves in the Cemetery, is listed as ‘Attorney’s clerk’ and this terminology lasted until the mid 1860s. It appears that the Company didn’t like to be tied down.

Domestic issues

But we are getting ahead of ourselves a bit here. Edward, as we know, was a family man and the domestic side of his life needs some explaining. Or at least an attempt should be made for there is one aspect that is a mystery.

Edward Nequest owned three graves in Hull General Cemetery. They are in compartment 105 close to the south side of the cemetery.

Nequest graves in comp 105

Whether he bought them all at the same time is debateable. What we do know was that the first purchase took place in 1850 for on the 3rd October the first burial took place within it. This was of a young girl, Jane Bell. This child was the daughter of ‘the late Robert Bell, Customs Officer’. I have struggled to find a family connection but in vain. The only supposition I have come up with is that Robert Bell may have been a friend and neighbour as the address given is Elizabeth Place, Hessle Road. This was very near to Edward’s own address at the time. I’m afraid this tenuous link is the best I can do.

1861

By the time of the 1861 census Edward had moved house. He now lived at a house in Porter Street with his wife and young daughter Mary Ann.

1861 census

Sadly, only 2 years later, in the July of 1863, this child was the second burial in this plot. Measles and consumption of the bowels was the cause of death.

Becoming superintendent

In November 1866 John Shields, the first superintendent passed away suddenly. In the following January the Board appointed Edward Nequest to the post of superintendent.

They also decided, short-sightedly, to combine the roles of superintendent and secretary. Seemingly implemented as a cost-cutting measure it alienated their solicitor, the fore-mentioned C.S.Todd who resigned from the Board. When he became the secretary to the Local Board of Health this alienation came back to bite the Company but that is another story. An Anniversary

The minute books

The minute books of the Company record this decision.

‘Special meeting of directors 20/12/66. Present Irving, Bell and Oldham

‘The vacancy occasioned by the death of Mr S. the late superintendent again came under consideration of the board when the question as to the desirability of amalgamating the two offices of secretary and supt., was discussed and it was ultimately unanimously resolved that in the opinion  of the board, the time has now arrived when it seems desirable that the two offices of sec., and supt., may be advantageously combined.

It was further resolved that a copy of the foregoing resolution be handed to C.S.Todd esq, the secretary and that the directors have an early interview with him on the subject. The necessity of filling up the vacancy occasioned by Mr. Shield’s death having been discussed and an application for the office received from Mr Nequest having been considered it was unanimously resolved that taking  into consideration Mr Nequest’s long and satisfactory connection with the company the situation of supt., and registrar be offered to him at the salary of £110 per annum with the use of the lodge and this his duties to commence on Tuesday the first of January 1867.’

This appointment was recorded in the local press.

nequest appt jan 1867

A Company Man

It’s fair to say that Edward threw himself into his work, much like John Shields had done, and Michael Kelly after him would do. Edward often represented the Company at investigations and on committees. In 1868 he applied to Cottingham Local Government Board for them to provide two lamps outside of the Cemetery which they agreed to. This would have been the first street lighting on what was to become Princes Avenue.

He was less successful in 1873 when he asked them to repair the road outside the cemetery.

In 1869 he attended the Local Burial Board Committee and spoke, mentioning that new burial ground of the Corporation ( Old Western Cemetery) was rapidly filling up. The same year he had to explain that it was Company policy to give visiting clergymen a surplice at the office and not to give them a surplice at the graveside as one irate clergyman demanded. The Burial Board sided with Edward.

An important meeting

A more important meeting that Edward attended took place before this appointment as superintendent. On the 21st April 1860 the Hull Advertiser recorded his intervention into a meeting of the South Myton Guardian Society.

In the meeting, which appeared to have been called as to whether the parishioners of Holy Trinity should pay for a new burial ground, Edward was forthright. The snippets below, taken from a very long article, show that Edward was a bright, eloquent speaker who was passionate about the Cemetery.

Nequest south myton meeting april 1860 1

Still later, in defending the Hull General Cemetery’s charges,

nequest south myton 2

Needless to say that the parishioners voted against having a rate set against them for the purchase of a burial ground. The result of this was that Castle Street continued to be used for burial for a further year until Sophia Broadley donated the land to lay out Division Road cemetery in 1862.

1871 and after

By 1871 his family had increased and living in the lodge must have become a bit tiresome.

1871 census Nequest

As we know, three years later he requested that he be allowed to move from the lodge. Anniversary January 1874 This request was accepted by the Board and he moved out to a larger house. This was at 7, Zoological Terrace, situated on the corner of Norwood street and in between the Swedenborgian Church on one side and St Jude’s on the other corner of Norwood Street.

Spring Bank 1904

It is the building with the group of men outside of it on the pavement in this image. Here’s another image and it is the house with the steeple behind it.

Nequest's house, Spring Bank

Edward continued to live at this address until his death in the 20th century. By the time of the 1881 census there had been no new additions to the family but as you can see below Elizabeth had married.

1881 census Nequest

A terrible decade

She had married John Frederick Byron and had borne him a son, Frederick Edward the following year. Her husband was still living with his parents at 47, Stanley Street and he lists himself as a ‘foreman of wine and spirits warehouse’. 

In the 1880s his daughter, now Elizabeth Byron, lost three children. Ann on the 22nd of October 1885. She was 5 days old. The cause of death was put as premature birth. The following year, in October 1886, Ellen died at the age of 12 days old. Her cause of death was listed as disease of the spine. And in the February of 1889 another daughter, Lillie, died at the age of four from croup.

Culminating a terrible decade for Edward in the September of 1889 he lost his wife Ann. She died of cancer of the liver. Her death took place at 2, Albion Place, Quay Road, Bridlington. Cancer is rarely a sudden death and I surmise that Ann was away from home, probably with Edward, as a holiday / leave taking for both of them.

Edward's wife's burial record 1889

Going through the motions

It’s fair to say that the loss of his wife was a disaster for Edward. I would suppose that he no longer wanted to be associated with death for it now held painful memories for him. Sadly, worse was to come.

In the meantime, in the September of 1891, he offered his resignation from his post as Superintendent and Secretary for the Hull General Cemetery.

Its arrival is recorded in the Company minute books,

‘Read a letter that from Mr Nequest tendering his resignation of the office of secretary as and from 30 instance. Resolved that such a resignation be accepted. Read a letter from a Mr Kelly of Granville Street, Hull, for the office of secretary and superintendent rendered vacant by the resignation of Mr Nequest and after considering the same and it appearing that Mr Kelly was suitable person to fill the office it was resolved that Mr M Kelly be and he is hereby appointed secretary and superintendent on the terms named in his application.’

His daughter

Edward’s daughter by now had a family of three children. Frederick Edward now aged 10, Charles aged 8 and Gertie, born that year. Her husband, John Frederick, now listed himself as a dock labourer, so a definite coming down in the world for the family. They lived at Ebenezer Place, Raywell Street which was off Charles Street.

By the 1901 census John Frederick is nowhere to be seen and Elizabeth is listed as a widow. Indeed this is strange record for all the inhabitants are simply designated with initials.

Elizabeth Nequest 1901 census

The truth of the matter is that John Frederick had absconded to the United States where he proceeded to make a new life for himself and scant regard for his past life.

His mother had died in 1883 and his father died in 1894. By 1895 he had emigrated. two years later he committed bigamy by marrying Ruth Newman on the 15th September 1897 in Salt Lake City. I say committed bigamy but Salt lake City was and is the home of the Mormon religion and polygamy is accepted and recognised there. Did John F Byron become a Mormon? We have no way of knowing. Suffice to say that he had six more sons and five more daughters whilst in the USA so we can say he embraced his second wife if not the religion. He died in 1918 in Idaho.

Her illness

We have no idea why he absconded. It could well have been that his wife Elizabeth was ill. She eventually died from locomotor ataxia. This disease was and is extremely problematic and embarrassing for sufferers. Predominantly it is a disease of the spine. It manifests itself in locomotion issues such as jerky walking and disorientated movements which give the appearance of being drunk. Sufferers need to constantly check where there are limbs are. It is often a symptom of Tabes Dorsalis which itself is often a symptom of tertiary syphilis.

Elizabeth Byron, Edward's daughter burial rec

Elizabeth died in 1903. She is buried in grave number 14765, the bottom burial plot in the image shown earlier. You many note that the other grave plots are classed as B whilst Elizabeth’s is D. She is the sole occupant of that grave plot. I’m sure, like me, you can hypothesise about why this occurred but it is only guesswork and perhaps we should leave this tragedy untroubled.

1911 and beyond

Edward's 1911 census

The 1911 census shows Edward living in his home with his son Edward and a housekeeper. The house was spacious consisting of eight rooms and both the Edwards appear to be living a comfortable life.

The elder Edward died on the 3rd July 1920 at the age of 97.

Edward Nequest burial record

His son then married! At the age of 56!! Once again we can wonder at this turn of events. Did the younger Edward love someone whom his father disapproved? We shall never know. And once again tragedy stalks this family. The younger Edward survived his father by less than five months, dying in the December of the same year.

He left a gross estate of £3,301 and personal wealth of £731 to his new bride Mary Elizabeth (nee Young) who continued to live in 183 Spring Bank. On February 2nd 1949, Mary Elizabeth Nequest died. She was cremated and her ashes were buried alongside her husband and her in-laws in grave number 14363. With her death this line of the family ended.

Obituary

Finally let us leave with the obituary that the Hull Daily Mail saw fit to print about Edward.

obit nequest 1920

 

 

Anniversary January 1874

New Year’s Day is the anniversary of some interest. This anniversary of January 1874 shows that Gothic may be nice to look at but as to living in it. Well that’s another matter.

On that day in 1874, the superintendent wrote to the Board and asked to leave the lodge. The superintendent, Edward Nequest, had lived in the lodge since the previous occupant had died.

1871 census Nequest

The previous occupant was John Shields. He was the first superintendent of the cemetery and had died in 1866. However he had requested to move out of the lodge some time before this and moved to a house in Derringham Street.

After Edward Nequest had moved on the lodge was rented out to George Ingleby, the gardener for the Cemetery. Michael Kelly, the next superintendent took on the lodge. He too found it trying and asked to be able to find his own accommodation.

Just before its demolition in 1925 the chairman had referred to it at the AGM as, ‘the old, perished, insanitary lodge.

So, it’s quite possible that although the lodge was beautiful to look at, it was not a great place to live in.

HGC lodge

Nequest said in a presentation to the Board that,

that the Lodge in which he resided was very damp and unsuitable to live in and having requested  the Board to provide him with a residence outside the cemetery and the matter having been considered it was resolved that Mr Nequest do provide himself with a suitable  house and that the Company allow him £20 a year towards the rent of such house and provide him with coals and gas  heretofore.’

Census entries

That the Board accepted this demand so easily perhaps shows that they were fully aware of the force of his argument. After all they met in one of the rooms of the lodge and must have seen how bad things were.

1881 census Nequest

Edward Nequest moved from the lodge to a house on Spring Bank. In the image above, taken from the 1881 census, Edward then lived at 7, Zoological Terrace.

By the time of the 1891 census this address had been renumbered to 183, Spring Bank. Edward continued to live there until his death in 1920. The house stood on the corner of Norwood Street only a few doors away from Peter Hodsman, the master stonemason of the cemetery. Stonemason of the Cemetery

Formerly house of Edward Neguest cemetery supt HGC

This image was taken by Chris Ketchell just over 25 years ago. In the 1980s it was a butcher’s shop.

 

The End of the Road

At the junction between Princes Avenue and Spring Bank West stands a curved row of shops. I suppose you could call it the end of the road. They stretch from the cemetery up to the three storied Dutch style row of shops that line Princes Avenue’s north western side.

The curved row of shops was built around 1926 and took the place of the entrance and lodge that graced the cemetery. Designed by Gelder and Kitchin they were designed to assist the road widening that went on then. They also were a fashionable design statement for the time.

For those with long memories three of the shops were rented by the toy shop Dugglebys. Their shop window displays were a joy to bay with no pocket money. For those people who have more recent memories the shop Gwenap was a highlight. Featuring risqué items of clothing and a selection of ‘sex toys’ it became something of a tourist attraction. Both shops have sadly closed now.

The Office at the End of the Road

However this item deals with the first two units of the block. These are the two nearest the cemetery. When the Lodge was destroyed the Company need a replacement office. As such it owned the two units mentioned above. One became the cemetery office. A shop unit adjacent was rented out. The superintendent lived above both units in a flat.

By the time the Company was attempting to dissolve itself these were their final assets. In May 1972 the Hull Daily Mail published a short news item.  The newspaper stated that these units had been sold at auction. With this sale the management and administration of the cemetery ended.

The sale raised £2700. This money was used to fund the Company’s legal costs to terminate itself.

It truly was the end of the road, quite literally.

1972 Hull Daily Mail 5 13 72